Moderator: welshwizard


roflmao wrote:Probably the same reason why people don't use their directionals (turn signals).
I've always felt they should be options on cars.



norfolkcaravanner wrote:Yeah......asked some tosser in a beemer the other day if indicators were an "optional extra" on his 5 series....didn't get it..."stoney ground".....one day.....

welshwizard wrote:norfolkcaravanner wrote:Yeah......asked some tosser in a beemer the other day if indicators were an "optional extra" on his 5 series....didn't get it..."stoney ground".....one day.....
I had an M3 not so long ago, but I got rid of it just before I was due to have my complimentary BMW driver lobotomy, and it wasn't really the sort of car a white man wants to drive around in South London village.

Phonecbr1100 wrote:As a car driver and motorcyclist , I think sidelights should be banned on moving vehicles. It seems that the drivers seem to think they can be seen with sidlights that have less glow than a torch with flat batteries. We ought to follow Denmarks lead and have headlights on ALL the time

Ivor Bigtruck wrote:Phonecbr1100 wrote:As a car driver and motorcyclist , I think sidelights should be banned on moving vehicles. It seems that the drivers seem to think they can be seen with sidlights that have less glow than a torch with flat batteries. We ought to follow Denmarks lead and have headlights on ALL the time
I think this is soon to be law anyway.
I know a motorcycle instructor who would disagree though claiming a motorbike with headlights on is all but invisible against the setting sun, or when travelling out of direct sunlight. I think this is why so many motorbikes are fitted with purple coloured lenses or bulbs to make them more distinct in this situation (and not 'cos they think it makes 'em look cool).

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests